Blue and Pink and Gender-Specific Baby Clothing
irst, I just wanted to say that my poggy silence for the past several days directly represents both my internalized and my externalized celebration of our new President-Elect (which, by the way, YAY!), but the silence has also resulted from the preparations being made for my sister’s upcoming baby shower, which is now less than a week away. But who’s counting.
Although I have quite a few friends with babies, I have never attended a baby shower, nor have I spent much time in the “Infant” department of retail stores. And I’ve certainly never patronized an all-baby-all-the-time store such as Babies ‘R Us.
Now, I’m well aware of the gender-specific binaries that run rampant throughout Western culture, for their flame has had centuries of fueling. Girl = pink, Boy = blue, blah blah blah.
(*Sidenote: There’s a fabulous French movie called Ma vie en rose (1997), which craftily employs the pink/blue binary through set design and clothing in order to illustrate various characters’ evolving relationships with this type of dualistic thinking as they relate –or DON’T relate– to the main character, who is a little girl born in a little boy’s body. Umm…was that just a major run-on? Yeah, I’m a writing instructor. Sheesh.)
Media packaging of the pink/blue binary through television and advertising is one thing; however, the attempted reenforcement of this binary by parents proves doubly alarming for me. Example: When I was nine or ten years-old, all I wanted for my birthday was a 10-speed bicycle. But not just any 10-speed bicycle: I desperately wanted a RED 10-speed bicycle. And my mother knew this. So, once it came time for my birthday party and my presents were to be festively filtered into our living room, I was pretty much dancing in my pants, aching with anticipation for the big red reveal. Finally, my mom wheeled in my new 10-speed………..gasps from the audience……….rather than purchasing me my desired red, regal wonder, all I saw was…PINK. Pink, seemingly everywhere: from the seat to the handlebars to the wheels to the freakin’ pedals. PINK. And not just any pink, either: PEPTO-BISMOL PINK (which I suppose was somewhat fitting considering the indigestion I felt upon seeing this barftastic contraption on wheels). GAG. It was like Paris Hilton barfed a bike.
And, I mean, yes, OK, pink is a derivative of red. Fine. But… if that was my mom’s line of thinking, she was taking some major creative license there. How was I ever supposed to be taken seriously on such a thing?!?
For whatever reason, my mom refused to exchange the Pepto-speed for the color I had actually desired. I was not particularly well-versed in expressing my distaste/disapproval of certain things when I was a child (umm…I’m still not), but I’m pretty sure that the pink Huffy inspired some pretty vehement, objectionable words. But still, my mom wouldn’t budge. And that pink Huffy became the bane of my existence, from elementary school right through junior high.
God, I’m still embarrassed for myself just thinking about it.
Anyway, my point with all this is: despite the progress that has been made with gender and sexual stereotypes for the past couple of decades, my recent trips to various retail outlets’ children’s departments (both online and not) have proven that much progress still remains. MUCH progress.
I think I’ve mentioned that my sister’s having twins, right? One boy, one girl. I have been chomping at the freakin’ bit to rampage around baby clothes and pick out super cute outfits for my future niece and nephew… but when I finally got to Target, I was ready to throw a temper tantrum. Growing up, I always felt like boys had it made when it came to clothing — they always had more comfortable, versatile stuff, as far as I was concerned. And then I’d go to the girls’ section and there’d be a bunch of pastel garbage that was closer fitting to the body (and, therefore, WAY uncomfortable as far as I was concerned). It sucked. But I had just assumed that things had changed, and that my future niece would have way cooler options to stand out in a comfortable, non-frilly way alongside her brother. But instead, what I found was a bunch of pink bullsh*t, generally with some floral pattern and/or a reference to princesses. COME ON!!! Haven’t we advanced past this woe-is-me, save-me-I’m-dainty-and-helpless type of gender restriction?!? Ugh. It drives me nuts. Meanwhile, all the boy clothing has super cool animals and modern technological references… I mean, why can’t “girl clothing” have some doggies or something? Rather than cats? Since when did girls = cats and boys = dogs?!? I despise cats. I am therefore a boy.
I could go on and on forever about this, but I’ll stop. I would love to tell you the items that I ended up purchasing for my sister/the twins, but my sister might read this, so… maybe I’ll clue you in after the shower on Saturday. Because I’m sure you’ll all be white-knucklin’ it until then, dying from suspense.
Hope you’ve all enjoyed your weekend.
Inappropriate Baby Attire, version 2.0
ore freaky-deaky clothing that appears to be created more for certain adults’ sick sense of humor than for innocent, little baby minds that can’t even pronounce the word “gross” and voice their discontent. I mean, yes, OK, I’ll admit: a couple of the onesie designs I’m about to show you did make me chuckle a bit; however, that’s precisely the point: they’re intended for adults. Wait — did I just call myself an “adult”?! That’s a gross exaggeration in itself. But anyway, my point is that we shouldn’t use our kids as our own humoristic-verging-on-sick-and-perverted marketing ploys.
So then, allow me to introduce my second inaugural
INAPPROPRIATE BABY ATTIRE
pog, this time courtesy of TShirtHell.com:
Now that’s just inappropriate…
think I’ve already mentioned somewhere on here that my sister’s pregnant with twins (one boy, one girl!)… those little monkeys will be comin’ ’round the mountain in the next couple of months, and I don’t think I’m alone when I say that I CAN’T FREAKIN’ WAIT!!!!!!!!!! I‘ve always wanted to be an aunt, almost as much as I’ve always wanted to be a parent. Or maybe more, because an aunt doesn’t really need to take charge of the whole discipline thing. Or the whole buying diapers thing. But I will definitely be partaking in the whole buying cute baby/kid clothes thing! Oh, yeah. Make no mistake about it, my friends…! (<-McCainism)
But here’s the thing: there are some scary-@ss baby fashion disasters waiting to happen out there. Now, if you’ve ever even winked at my blog, you know that I’m not exactly a conservative. That being said, a line has to be drawn somewhere when it comes to the images we are projecting onto the future of this world (*cue Whitney Houston, because the children are her future, too). I would never be able to live with myself, or take my niece & nephew out in public, if they were clothed in any of the onesies and bibs that I am about to present to you.
Without further ado, I offer you today’s
INAPPROPRIATE BABY ATTIRE
(maybe I’ll even make it a weekly thing, because trust me, there are a gazillion more where these came from):
(These lovely little gems *gag* are all courtesy of CafePress.com)






artin Luther King, Jr., probably didn’t think that his monumental, historic fight for civil liberties would result in a holiday that spawns huge clothing sales and a free day for students to go gorge on buttery popcorn and Sour Patch Kids at the local multiplex. 































